Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2016-09-20

Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] perf annotate: Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-09-19 15:44:26
Also in: lkml

Em Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:29:35PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target when its already
identified as a call. This is an extension of commit e8ea1561952b
("perf annotate: Use raw form for register indirect call instructions")
to generalize annotation for all instructions with indirect calls.

This is needed for certain powerpc call instructions that use address
in a register (such as bctrl, btarl, ...).

Apart from that, when kcore is used to disassemble function, all call
instructions were ignored. This patch will fix it as a side effect by
not ignoring them. For example,

Before (with kcore):
       mov    %r13,%rdi
       callq  0xffffffff811a7e70
     ^ jmpq   64
       mov    %gs:0x7ef41a6e(%rip),%al

After (with kcore):
       mov    %r13,%rdi
     > callq  0xffffffff811a7e70
     ^ jmpq   64
       mov    %gs:0x7ef41a6e(%rip),%al
Ok, makes sense, but then now I have the -> and can't press enter to go
to that function, in fact for the case I'm using as a test, the
vsnprintf kernel function, I get:

       │ 56:   test   %al,%al                                                                                                                                ▒
       │     ↓ je     81                                                                                                                                     ▒
       │       lea    -0x38(%rbp),%rsi                                                                                                                       ▒
       │       mov    %r15,%rdi                                                                                                                              ▒
       │     → callq  0xffffffff993e3230 

That 0xffffffff993e3230 should've been resolved to:

[root@jouet ~]# grep ffffffff993e3230 /proc/kallsyms 
ffffffff993e3230 t format_decode

Trying to investigate why it doesn't...

- Arnaldo
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
[Suggested about 'bctrl' instruction]
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <redacted>
---
Changes in v6:
  - No change

 tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index ea07588..a05423b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -81,16 +81,12 @@ static int call__parse(struct ins_operands *ops, const char *norm_arch)
 	return ops->target.name == NULL ? -1 : 0;
 
 indirect_call:
-	tok = strchr(endptr, '(');
-	if (tok != NULL) {
+	tok = strchr(endptr, '*');
+	if (tok == NULL) {
 		ops->target.addr = 0;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	tok = strchr(endptr, '*');
-	if (tok == NULL)
-		return -1;
-
 	ops->target.addr = strtoull(tok + 1, NULL, 16);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.5.5
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help