Re: [PATCH v14 15/15] selftests/powerpc: Fix a build issue
From: Cyril Bur <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-14 04:55:58
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 15:33 +0800, wei.guo.simon@gmail.com wrote:
From: Anshuman Khandual <redacted>
Fixes the following build failure -
cp_abort.c:90:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
allowed in C99 or C11 mode
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
^
cp_abort.c:90:3: note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or
-std=gnu11 to compile your code
cp_abort.c:97:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
allowed in C99 or C11 mode
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <redacted>Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c index 5a5b55a..1ce7dce 100644--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int test_cp_abort(void)/* 128 bytes for a full cache line */ char buf[128] __cacheline_aligned; cpu_set_t cpuset; - int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid; + int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid, i; char c; /* only run this test on a P9 or later */@@ -87,14 +87,14 @@ int test_cp_abort(void)FAIL_IF(pid < 0); if (!pid) { - for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { FAIL_IF((write(fd1[WRITE_FD], &c, 1)) != 1); FAIL_IF((read(fd2[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1); /* A paste succeeds if CR0 EQ bit is set */ FAIL_IF(paste(buf) & 0x20000000); } } else { - for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) { FAIL_IF((read(fd1[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1); copy(buf); FAIL_IF((write(fd2[WRITE_FD], &c, 1) != 1));