[pasemi] Internal CompactFlash (CF) card device not recognised after the powerpc-4.8-1 merge
From: Christian Zigotzky <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-12 09:06:51
Hi All, I reverted the commit https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/diff/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c?id=bad60e6f259a01cf9f29a1ef8d435ab6c60b2de9. It boots but it doesn't find any partitions. Cheers, Christian On 11 August 2016 at 5:03 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi All, I was able to patch the RC1 with the Nemo and PHB-numbering patch. Additionally I added some printks in the file pata_of_platform.c. I wanted to know which values have the following variables: ctl_res = io_res; io_res.start += 0x800; ctl_res.start = ctl_res.start + 0x80e; io_res.end = ctl_res.start-1; It compiled without any problems but unfortunately I didn't see any printk outputs of these variables. The output of pata_of_platform is missing too. I see this output in the dmesg of the kernel 4.7 but I don't see it in the dmesg of the kernel 4.8. I have the feeling, that pata_of_platform doesn't work anymore. Maybe this is the reason, why the CF card doesn't work anymore. Maybe this is the problem: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/diff/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/setup.c?id=bad60e6f259a01cf9f29a1ef8d435ab6c60b2de9 Do you have any hints for me? Cheers, Christian On 05 August 2016 at 11:42 PM, Darren Stevens wrote:quoted
Hello Nicholas On 06/08/2016, Nicholas Piggin wrote:quoted
Hi Christian,On 05 August 2016 at 1:41 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote: Hi All, The internal PASEMI CompactFlash (CF) card device doesn't work anymore after the powerpc-4.8-1 merge. That means the code for the internal CF card device in the Nemo patch doesn't work after the first PowerPC merge. The CompactFlash (CF) card slot is wired to the CPU local bus. It is typically used to hold the Linux kernel. I know it isn't well to use an own patch for that but I think it is a good time to integrate the PASEMI internal CompactFlash (CF) card device to the official kernel. What do you think? I am not a programmer so I can't integrate the source code for the internal CF card device. But maybe you can take the patch and integrate it. We use the following patch for the kernel 4.7: diff -rupN a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c --- a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c 2016-08-05 09:58:41.410569036 +0200 +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c 2016-08-05 09:59:54.414288884 +0200 @@ -41,14 +41,36 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct return -EINVAL; } - ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 1, &ctl_res); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "can't get CTL address from " - "device tree\n"); - return -EINVAL; + if (of_device_is_compatible(dn, "electra-ide")) { + /* Altstatus is really at offset 0x3f6 from the primary window + * on electra-ide. Adjust ctl_res and io_res accordingly. + */ + ctl_res = io_res; + ctl_res.start = ctl_res.start+0x3f6; + io_res.end = ctl_res.start-1; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI_SB600 + } else if (of_device_is_compatible(dn, "electra-cf")) { + /* Task regs are at 0x800, with alt status @ 0x80e in the primary window + * on electra-cf. Adjust ctl_res and io_res accordingly. + */ + ctl_res = io_res; + io_res.start += 0x800; + ctl_res.start = ctl_res.start + 0x80e; + io_res.end = ctl_res.start-1; +#endif + } else { + ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 1, &ctl_res); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "can't get CTL address from " + "device tree\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } } irq_res = platform_get_resource(ofdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0); + if (irq_res) + irq_res->flags = 0; prop = of_get_property(dn, "reg-shift", NULL); if (prop) @@ -65,6 +87,11 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct dev_info(&ofdev->dev, "pio-mode unspecified, assuming PIO0\n"); } +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI_SB600 + irq_res = 0; // force irq off (doesn't seem to work) +#endif + + pio_mask = 1 << pio_mode; pio_mask |= (1 << pio_mode) - 1; @@ -74,7 +101,11 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct static struct of_device_id pata_of_platform_match[] = { { .compatible = "ata-generic", }, - { }, + { .compatible = "electra-ide", }, +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI_SB600 + { .compatible = "electra-cf",}, +#endif + {}, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pata_of_platform_match); dmesg with the kernel 4.7: zcat /var/log/dmesg.1.gz | grep -i ata7 [ 2.939788] ata7: PATA max PIO0 no IRQ, using PIO polling mmio cmd 0xf0000800 ctl 0xf000080e [ 3.099186] ata7.00: CFA: SanDisk SDCFB-256, HDX 2.33, max PIO4 [ 3.099191] ata7.00: 501760 sectors, multi 0: LBA [ 3.099199] ata7.00: configured for PIO The dmesg of the latest Git kernel doesn't have any output of our internal CF card device. Could you please integrate our PASEMI CF card device again? Thanks, Christianquoted
As for your driver support, it would indeed be a good idea to get it supported in the upstream kernel. You should post a new mail about that. Take a look at these 3 commits: 61f7162117d4767875825abf2f6ed1eeebbcceed 9cd55be4d22376893d2818ce3c0e5706a3d74121 ca99140a63b7326ee9a38f64c326317f2c63b594 Your patch comes from code based on the second one. The last commit removed it, and says that it is not the best way to implement it. You could cc this list and some of the people involved with those commits and ask ask for advice about getting your driver supported.Actually, it's almost supported by the base PASemi code anyway, there is a PCMCIA driver in setup.c, but our hardware has been changed enough to make it hang the system when used. I should probably take another look and see If I can fix that. The other option would be to move the above patch to where we add our rtc platform device. One thing that does confuse me is the interrupt, it's attached to GPIO 0, so should be on the mpic int 0 (or maybe 16?)but I could never get it to work. Regards Darren