Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format
From: Jiri Olsa <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-31 14:55:04
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 07:42:47AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
hi, I had discussion with Ingo about the state of this patchset and there's one more requirement from his side - to split event files into per topic filesThanks Jiri.quoted
I made some initial changes over latest Sukadev's branch and came up with something like this:Did you just split it by the "Topic" fields?
yep
quoted
$ find pmu-events/arch/x86/ pmu-events/arch/x86/ pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Memory.json pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Virtual-Memory.json pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Cache.json pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Pipeline.json pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Floating-point.json pmu-events/arch/x86/NehalemEX_core/Other.json pmu-events/arch/x86/mapfile.csv pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Memory.json pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Virtual-Memory.json pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Cache.json pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Pipeline.json pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Floating-point.json pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Other.json pmu-events/arch/x86/Broadwell_core/Frontend.json so let's have a discussion if this is acceptable for you guysSplitting is fine for me, as long as it's scriptable. I already have some scripts to generate the perf json files, can update them to split.
yep, there's split-json.py script earlier in the perf/json branch
quoted
I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and it's not that bad ;-)Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes.
sure so, if you're ok with the layout, how do you want to proceed further? thanks, jirka