Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-08-01

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-07-20 06:30:19
Also in: kvm, qemu-devel


On 20/07/2016 07:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Thanks.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Or do you want me to merge this before Paul gets back?
No, this should be merged through the KVM tree.  Please Cc the KVM
maintainers before offering to apply a patch that formally belongs to
another tree.

I don't care if Paul merges the patch or Radim and I do, but we're
getting lots of unnecessary conflicts from patches that go through the
main architecture tree and that shouldn't really happen.  Please let's
keep some discipline, as I want to minimize the number of conflicts that
reach Linus (and 4.8 is going to be *bad* in this respect, with both PPC
and s390 having conflicts between the KVM and arch tree).

In particular this patch would indeed have a conflict, because you have

+#define KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM 129

but cap numbers 129 and 130 are already taken.  So whoever applies it
should bump the number to 131.

Paolo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help