Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2016-07-11

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Fix bug where AFU disable operation had no effect

From: Ian Munsie <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-30 16:45:46

Excerpts from Frederic Barrat's message of 2016-06-30 17:50:00 +0200:
Le 30/06/2016 17:32, Ian Munsie a écrit :
quoted
quoted
For dedicated mode, the CAIA recommends an explicit reset of the AFU
quoted
(section 2.1.1).
True, I had forgotten that procedure was added to the document before it
was made public - I'll update the comment and resend.
Actually, my point was that for dedicated mode, we shouldn't have the 
"if" and always reset. It's only for dedicated mode, so it wouldn't 
impact cx4 and we would stay CAIA-compliant. If one day, there's a xsl 
with a dedicated mode AFU, they are expected to follow the spec.
Yeah, I thought of that as well while I was updating the patch and
removed that from the dedicated path. I still added a comment to that
path to note that though.

Cheers,
-Ian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help