Re: [6/6] ppc: ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF
From: Naveen N. Rao <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-21 07:00:26
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On 2016/06/21 09:38AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 23:06 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:quoted
On 2016/06/17 10:53PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2016-07-06 at 13:32:23 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..954ff53 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c@@ -0,0 +1,956 @@...quoted
quoted
quoted
+ +static void bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns(void *area, unsigned int size) +{ + int *p = area; + + /* Fill whole space with trap instructions */ + while (p < (int *)((char *)area + size)) + *p++ = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; +}This breaks the build for some configs, presumably you're missing a header: arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:30:10: error: 'BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION' undeclared (first use in this function) http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12720611/Oops. Yes, I should have caught that. I need to add: #include <asm/kprobes.h> in bpf_jit_comp64.c Can you please check if it resolves the build error?Can you? :D
:) Sorry, I should have explained myself better. I did actually try your config and I was able to reproduce the build error. After the above #include, that error went away, but I saw some vdso related errors. I thought I was doing something wrong and needed a different setup for that particular kernel config, which is why I requested your help in the matter. I just didn't do a good job of putting across that message... Note to self: randconfig builds *and* more time drafting emails :) Do you want me to respin the patches? Thanks, Naveen