On Wednesday 15 June 2016 06:14 PM, George Spelvin wrote:
Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
quoted
+#if (__BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN) && (BITS_PER_LONG != 64)
+ tmp = addr[(((nbits - 1)/BITS_PER_LONG) - (start / BITS_PER_LONG))]
+ ^ invert;
+#else
tmp = addr[start / BITS_PER_LONG] ^ invert;
+#endif
Than you for diagnosing this problem, but I don't think the fix
is correct.
1) It's not clear that all users of _find_next_bit and for_each_set_bit()
want this change.
2) Is your code even correct? I'd think you'd want addr[x ^ 1]. Are you
sure you shpuld be reversing the whole array, and not just the halves of
each 64-bit word?
3) You've now broken the case of 32-bit big-endian kernel.
Yes. But looks like we havent hit this case yet. Will post a fix.
Maddy
I think the proper solution is uglier than this. :-(