Re: [PATCH 2/8] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.
From: Dave Young <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-14 01:23:04
Also in:
kexec, lkml
On 06/13/16 at 04:08pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
Hello Dave, Thanks for the quick review and for your comments. I'll separate the change to add arch_walk_system_ram and the change to add kexec_locate_mem_hole into different patches, and add error handling for KEXEC_ON_CRASH. Am Montag, 13 Juni 2016, 15:29:39 schrieb Dave Young:quoted
On 06/12/16 at 12:10am, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:quoted
Allow architectures to specify different memory walking functions for kexec_add_buffer. Intel uses iomem to track reserved memory ranges, but PowerPC uses the memblock subsystem.Can the crashk_res be inserted to iomem_resource so that only one weak function for system ram is needed?Sorry, it's not clear to me what you mean by inserting crashk_res into
Hmm, I means exporting crashkernel mem to /proc/iomem like other arches It is just oneline: insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res) But your proposal below is also fine.
iomem_resource, but I can add a bool for_crashkernel to arch_walk_system_ram so that it can decide which kind of memory to traverse, so the default implementation of kexec_file.c would be: int __weak arch_walk_system_ram(bool for_crashkernel, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool top_down, void *data, int (*func)(u64, u64, void *))
arch_walk_mem sounds better?
{
int ret;
if (for_crashkernel)
ret = walk_iomem_res_desc(crashk_res.desc,
IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM |
IORESOURCE_BUSY,
start, end, data, func);
else
ret = walk_system_ram_res(start, end, data, func);
if (ret != 1) {
/* A suitable memory range could not be found for buffer */
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
}
}
and kexec_add_buffer / kexec_locate_mem_hole would call it with:
if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
ret = arch_walk_system_ram(true, crashk_res.start,
crashk_res.end, top_down, &buf,
locate_mem_hole_callback);
else
ret = arch_walk_system_ram(false, 0, -1, top_down, &buf,
locate_mem_hole_callback);
What do you think?Sounds good, but for_crashkernel can be image_type instead. and image->type can be passed to the arch_walk_mem function directly. Thanks Dave