Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2016-05-23

Re: [PATCH 3/4] rcutorture: Make -soundhw a x86 specific option

From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-23 21:21:13
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers: Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:24:12PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:38:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:23:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:40:42AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 07:10:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
quoted
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:23:10PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:42:23AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
quoted
The option "-soundhw pcspk" gives me a error on PPC as follow:

qemu-system-ppc64: ISA bus not available for pcspk

, which means this option doesn't work on ppc by default. So simply make
this an x86-specific option via identify_qemu_args().

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <redacted>
The emulated system for RCU testing does not need sound hardware at all.
Paul added this option in commit
16c77ea7d0f4a74e49009aa2d26c275f7f93de7c to disable the default sound
hardware, saying that '"-soundhw pcspk" makes the script a bit less
dependent on odd audio libraries being installed'.  Unfortunately, it
looks like there isn't a "-soundhw none".  As far as I can tell,
currently the only way to completely eliminate sound hardware is to pass
"-nodefaults" and then explicitly specify each desired device; while
that would solve the issue, it would likely introduce *more*
hardware-specific command-line options...

I've filed two feature requests on upstream qemu to make this simpler:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1583420 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1583421 .

Paul, what did you mean by "dependent on odd audio libraries"?  Did you
mean in the guest or the host?  And either way, is this something that
could potentially be solved another way?
If I remember correctly, Ubuntu 14.04 qemu refused to run the guest
without this option, but I don't recall the exact error message.
I chalked it up to my ignorance of qemu, but I would very much welcome
some way to not have to specify irrelevant hardware.  So thank you very
much for filing the bugs!
According to qemu upstream, qemu doesn't enable any sound hardware by
default, so I can't think of any obvious reason why adding "-soundhw
pcspkr" would make the rcutorture VM boot.  Did qemu refuse to run at
all, or did the VM start but fail during the boot process?

Could you check if you can currently run without this option?  If so,
perhaps we should just drop it for now.
Will do!  As soon as the current test completes.
And it now works just fine without the "-soundhw pcspkr".  Search me!
In that case, can you replace the patch in this series making "-soundhw
pcspkr" target-specific with one removing "-soundhw pcspkr"?
Fair point!  I queued the patch below, and am now testing it.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit d6126c701fe19c965cbb54cd5221da0db3287135
Author: Paul E. McKenney [off-list ref]
Date:   Mon May 23 14:18:48 2016 -0700

    rcutorture: Drop "-soundhw pcspkr" from x86 boot arguments
    
    Because recent testing shows that "-soundhw pcspkr" is no longer required
    in the kernel boot arguments, this commit drops this qemu argument.
    
    Reported-by: Josh Triplett [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney [off-list ref]
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/functions.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/functions.sh
index 56ac202859eb..1426a9b97494 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/functions.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/functions.sh
@@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ identify_qemu_append () {
 identify_qemu_args () {
 	case "$1" in
 	qemu-system-x86_64|qemu-system-i386)
-		echo -soundhw pcspk
 		;;
 	qemu-system-ppc64)
 		echo -enable-kvm -M pseries -nodefaults
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help