Re: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: OMAP36xx: : DT spelling s/#address-cell/#address-cells/
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: 2016-04-26 16:08:31
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-input, linux-pci
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-04-20 · Re: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: OMAP36xx: : DT spelling s/#address-cell/#address-cells/ · Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
- 2016-04-20 · [PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: OMAP36xx: : DT spelling s/#address-cell/#address-cells/ · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
* Rob Herring [off-list ref] [160420 16:48]:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi index ce1e242d4dc07ea8..8b797915300894d8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ abb_mpu_iva: regulator-abb-mpu { compatible = "ti,abb-v1"; regulator-name = "abb_mpu_iva"; - #address-cell = <0>; + #address-cells = <0>;dtc should flag this if it was really needed. However, it looks like it isn't as there are no child nodes (unless the board files add them). A nice dtc check would be to flag unnecessary #address-cells or #size-cells. That would only help here after your fix though.
Yeah. Applying patches 2 - 4 into omap-for-v4.7/dt thanks. Tony