Re: VDSO unmap and remap support for additional architectures
From: Christopher Covington <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-29 13:22:18
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, lkml
Hi Andy, On 04/28/2016 02:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 04/28/2016 08:18 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:quoted
Please take a look at the following prototype of sharing the PowerPC VDSO unmap and remap code with other architectures. I've only hooked up arm64 to begin with. If folks think this is a reasonable approach I can work on 32 bit ARM as well. Not hearing back from an earlier request for guidance [1], I simply dove in and started hacking. Laurent's test case [2][3] is a compelling illustration of whether VDSO remap works or not on a given architecture.I think there's a much nicer way: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461584223-9418-1-git-send-email-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com Could arm64 and ppc use this approach? These arch_xyz hooks are gross.
Thanks for the pointer. Any thoughts on how to keep essentially identical definitions of vdso_mremap from proliferating into every architecture and variant?
Also, at some point, possibly quite soon, x86 will want a way for
user code to ask the kernel to map a specific vdso variant at a specific
address. Could we perhaps add a new pair of syscalls:
struct vdso_info {
unsigned long space_needed_before;
unsigned long space_needed_after;
unsigned long alignment;
};
long vdso_get_info(unsigned int vdso_type, struct vdso_info *info);
long vdso_remap(unsigned int vdso_type, unsigned long addr, unsigned int flags);
#define VDSO_X86_I386 0
#define VDSO_X86_64 1
#define VDSO_X86_X32 2
// etc.
vdso_remap will map the vdso of the chosen type such at
AT_SYSINFO_EHDR lines up with addr. It will use up to
space_needed_before bytes before that address and space_needed_after
after than address. It will also unmap the old vdso (or maybe only do
that if some flag is set).
On x86, mremap is *not* sufficient for everything that's needed,
because some programs will need to change the vdso type.I don't I understand. Why can't people just exec() the ELF type that corresponds to the VDSO they want? Thanks, Cov -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project