From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Date: 2016-03-09 10:31:29
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 10:14 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
Hi Michael,
Le 09/03/2016 06:55, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
quoted
This breaks the SMP=n build:
Arg! I'm adding it to my checklist.
Don't worry about it too much. It's pretty obscure, and I have an automated
test for it.
We've broken the SMP=n build in the past for *months* at a time and no one's
noticed.