Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2016-03-16

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/8xx: Fix do_mtspr_cpu6 build on older compilers

From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Date: 2016-03-15 17:41:35
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 14:07 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Some versions of GCC, reportedly before 4.8, fail with
arch/powerpc/mm/8xx_mmu.c:139:2: error: memory input 1 is not directly
addressable
"before 4.8" means "< 4.8", not "<= 4.8" -- did you mean "before 4.9"?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Change the one-element array into a simple variable to avoid this.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
Cc: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
---
Verified with GCC 4.4.4 and GCC 4.8.3

v2: compilation result is compliant with CPU6 ERRATA
    (using stw/lwz and not stwx/lwzx)

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_8xx.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_8xx.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_8xx.h
index d41412c..94d01f8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_8xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_8xx.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_8xx_CPU6
 #define do_mtspr_cpu6(rn, rn_addr, v)	\
 	do {								
\
-		int _reg_cpu6 = rn_addr, _tmp_cpu6[1];		\
+		int _reg_cpu6 = rn_addr, _tmp_cpu6;		\
 		asm volatile("stw %0, %1;"				\
 			     "lwz %0, %1;"				\
 			     "mtspr " __stringify(rn) ",%2" :		
\
I thought I tried this with 4.7.2 without success, but now it seems to be
working...

-Scott
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help