Re: [PATCH v5 21/23] powerpc: Simplify test in __dma_sync()
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-04 13:42:19
Also in:
lkml
Le 04/02/2016 12:37, Denis Kirjanov a écrit :
On 2/4/16, Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This simplification helps the compiler. We now have only one test instead of two, so it reduces the number of branches. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> --- v2: new v3: no change v4: no change v5: no change arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.cb/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c index 169aba4..2dc74e5 100644--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void __dma_sync(void *vaddr, size_t size, int direction) * invalidate only when cache-line aligned otherwise there is * the potential for discarding uncommitted data from the cache */ - if ((start & (L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1)) || (size & (L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1))) + if ((start | end) & (L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1)) flush_dcache_range(start, end); else invalidate_dcache_range(start, end);The previous version of address cache-line aligned check reads perfectly fine. What's the benefit of this micro optimization?
With this optimisation we avoid one unneccessary test and two associated jumps. Taking into account that __dma_sync() is one of the top ten CPU consummers, I believe it is worth it: Without the patch: c000d894: 70 6a 00 0f andi. r10,r3,15 c000d898: 39 29 00 0f addi r9,r9,15 c000d89c: 54 63 00 36 rlwinm r3,r3,0,0,27 c000d8a0: 7d 23 48 50 subf r9,r3,r9 c000d8a4: 41 82 00 84 beq c000d928 <__dma_sync+0xb8> [...] c000d8c0: 7c 00 04 ac sync c000d8c4: 4e 80 00 20 blr [...] c000d928: 70 8a 00 0f andi. r10,r4,15 c000d92c: 40 a2 ff 7c bne c000d8a8 <__dma_sync+0x38> c000d930: 55 2a e1 3f rlwinm. r10,r9,28,4,31 c000d934: 41 a2 ff 8c beq c000d8c0 <__dma_sync+0x50> With the patch: c000d894: 7c 89 1b 78 or r9,r4,r3 c000d898: 71 2a 00 0f andi. r10,r9,15 c000d89c: 54 63 00 36 rlwinm r3,r3,0,0,27 c000d8a0: 38 84 00 0f addi r4,r4,15 c000d8a4: 7c 83 20 50 subf r4,r3,r4 c000d8a8: 41 82 00 84 beq c000d92c <__dma_sync+0xbc> [...] c000d8c4: 7c 00 04 ac sync c000d8c8: 4e 80 00 20 blr [...] c000d92c: 54 89 e1 3f rlwinm. r9,r4,28,4,31 c000d930: 41 a2 ff 94 beq c000d8c4 <__dma_sync+0x54> Christophe
quoted
-- 2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev