Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2016-01-07

Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: add FSL_SOC dependency to drivers using FSL_LBC

From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-01-07 20:34:22

Hi Scott,

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:47:33PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:21 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
quoted
I've managed to construct .config files (for ppc64) that come across
this Kconfig warning:

  warning: (MPC836x_RDK && MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC && MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM) selects
FSL_LBC which has unmet direct dependencies (FSL_SOC)

Let's add the FSL_SOC dependency to the NAND drivers. AFAICT, they are
only supported on PPC32 FSL SoCs anyway.
There are other problems, if you can enable an 83xx board on ppc64.  PPC_83xx
does select FSL_SOC so I don't know why it's unmet.
I don't have an 83xx board enabled. I just have MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC
enabled; it only depends on PPC right now. Attaching the current test
.config, for clarity.

So I guess only the first hunk of my patch is required right now.
FWIW, I think we should instead drop the FSL_SOC dependency from FSL_LBC.  It
doesn't use anything that I can see from fsl_soc.c.  It's been commonly abused
as a means for hiding the option on builds for other platforms, but that has
to stop anyway now that many of these devices are also on ARM-based chips. 
 eLBC isn't, since it was obsoleted by IFC, but it shouldn't be unnecessarily
different from IFC.  IFC currently depends on FSL_SOC but that needs to go
away.
Solve this however you'd like. Consider my patch just a bug report :)

Brian

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help