Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7
From: Laura Abbott <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-06 18:26:06
Also in:
lkml
On 10/05/2015 08:35 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 08:43 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:quoted
Hi, We received a report (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267395) of bad assembly when compiling on powerpc with little endian...quoted
After some discussion with the binutils folks, it turns out that the tlbie instruction actually requires another operand and binutils was updated to check for this https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-05/msg00133.html . The code sequence in arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc_asm.h now needs to be updated: #if !defined(CONFIG_4xx) && !defined(CONFIG_8xx) #define tlbia \ li r4,1024; \ mtctr r4; \ lis r4,KERNELBASE@h; \ 0: tlbie r4; \ addi r4,r4,0x1000; \ bdnz 0b #endif I don't know enough ppc assembly to properly fix this but I can test.How are you testing? This code is fairly old and I'm dubious if it still works. These days we have a ppc_md hook for flushing the TLB, ppc_md.flush_tlb(). Ideally the swsusp code would use that. cheers
Testing would probably just be compile and maybe boot. I don't have regular access to the hardware. This problem just showed up for me when someone tried to compile Fedora rawhide with the latest binutils. From what I can tell, it looks like the .flush_tlb of the cpu_spec is only defined for power7 and power8 and I don't see a ppc_md.flush_tlb on the master branch. It's not clear what to do for the case where there is no flush_tlb function. Would filling in a .flush_tlb for all the PPC_BOOK3S_64 with the existing tlbia sequence work? It's also worth noting that the __flush_power7 uses tlbiel instead of tlbie. Thanks, Laura