Re: [PATCH 0/2] VFIO: Accept IOMMU group (PE) ID
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-19 06:28:11
Also in:
kvm
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:47:32AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:24 +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:quoted
This allows to accept IOMMU group (PE) ID from the parameter from userland when handling EEH operation so that the operation only affects the target IOMMU group (PE). If the IOMMU group (PE) ID in the parameter from userland is invalid, all IOMMU groups (PEs) attached to the specified container are affected as before. Gavin Shan (2): drivers/vfio: Support EEH API revision drivers/vfio: Support IOMMU group for EEH operations drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ include/linux/vfio.h | 13 +++++++--- include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 6 +++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)This interface is terrible. A function named foo_enabled() should return a bool, yes or no, don't try to overload it to also return a version.
Sorry, that one's my fault. I suggested that approach to Gavin without really thinking it through.
AFAICT, patch 2/2 breaks current users by changing the offset of the union in struct vfio_eeh_pe_err.
Yeah, this one's ugly. We have to preserve the offset, but that means putting the group in a very awkward place. Especially since I'm not sure if there even are any existing users of the single extant union branch. Sigh.
Also, we generally pass group file descriptors rather than a group ID because we can prove the ownership of the group through the file descriptor and we don't need to worry about races with the group because we can hold a reference to it.
-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachments
- (unnamed) [application/pgp-signature] 819 bytes