On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 07:38 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
... nothing
Sure this patch looks obvious, but please give me a changelog that proves
you've thought about it thoroughly.
For example is it OK to use for_each_node() at this point in boot? Is there any
historical reason why we did it with a hard coded loop? If so what has changed.
What systems have you tested on? etc. etc.
cheers
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index 8b9502a..8d8a541 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
setup_nr_node_ids();
/* allocate the map */
- for (node = 0; node < nr_node_ids; node++)
+ for_each_node(node)
alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&node_to_cpumask_map[node]);
/* cpumask_of_node() will now work */