Re: [5/8] powerpc/slb: Add documentation to runtime patching of SLB encoding
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2015-08-12 05:12:54
On Wed, 2015-29-07 at 07:10:02 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch adds some documentation to 'patch_slb_encoding' function explaining about how it clears the existing immediate value in the given instruction and inserts a new one there. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c index c87d5de..1962357 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c@@ -279,7 +279,18 @@ void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm) static inline void patch_slb_encoding(unsigned int *insn_addr, unsigned int immed) { - int insn = (*insn_addr & 0xffff0000) | immed; + + /* + * This function patches either an li or a cmpldi instruction with + * a new immediate value. This relies on the fact that both li + * (which is actually addi) and cmpldi both take a 16-bit immediate + * value, and it is situated in the same location in the instruction, + * ie. bits 16-31 (Big endian bit order) or the lower 16 bits. + * To patch the value we read the existing instruction, clear the + * immediate value, and or in our new value, then write the instruction + * back. + */ + unsigned int insn = (*insn_addr & 0xffff0000) | immed; patch_instruction(insn_addr, insn); }
As Segher pointed out the signedness of the immediate value differs between the instructions, I added: + * The signedness of the immediate operand differs between the two + * instructions however this code is only ever patching a small value, + * much less than 1 << 15, so we can get away with it. cheers