Re: [PATCH 1/8] jump_label: no need to acquire the jump_label_mutex in jump_lable_init()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2015-08-20 18:29:19
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:14:29PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
The jump_label_init() run in a very early stage, even before the sched_init(). So there is no chance for concurrent access of the jump label table.
It also doesn't hurt to have it. Its better to be consistent and conservative with locking unless there is a pressing need.