Re: [RFC,1/2] powerpc/numa: fix cpu_to_node() usage during boot
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2015-07-08 04:01:06
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2015-02-07 at 23:02:02 UTC, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Much like on x86, now that powerpc is using USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID, we have an ordering issue during boot with early calls to cpu_to_node().
"now that .." implies we changed something and broke this. What commit was it that changed the behaviour?
The value returned by those calls now depend on the per-cpu area being setup, but that is not guaranteed to be the case during boot. Instead, we need to add an early_cpu_to_node() which doesn't use the per-CPU area and call that from certain spots that are known to invoke cpu_to_node() before the per-CPU areas are not configured. On an example 2-node NUMA system with the following topology: available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 node 0 size: 2029 MB node 0 free: 1753 MB node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7 node 1 size: 2045 MB node 1 free: 1945 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 40 1: 40 10 we currently emit at boot: [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 1 2 3 [0] 4 5 6 7 After this commit, we correctly emit: [ 0.000000] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 1 2 3 [1] 4 5 6 7
So it looks fairly sane, and I guess it's a bug fix. But I'm a bit reluctant to put it in straight away without some time in next. It looks like the symptom is that the per-cpu areas are all allocated on node 0, is that all that goes wrong? cheers