Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: updates related to tick_broadcast_enter() failures

"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] writes:

On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 05:13:27 PM Kevin Hilman wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 03:59:55 PM Kevin Hilman wrote:

quoted

"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] writes:

[...]

quoted

Second, quite honestly, I don't see a connection to genpd here.

The connection with genpd is because the *reason* the timer was
shutdown/stopped is because it shares power with the CPU, which is why
the timer stops when the CPU hits ceratin low power states.  IOW, it's
in the same power domain as the CPU.

Well, what if you don't have genpd on that system?  Is the problem at hand not
relevant then magically?

Well, if you're not using genpd to model hardware power domain
dependencies, then yes you'll definitely need a different solution.

And, as we discussed on IRC.  If you only care about timers, and genpd
is not in use, then $SUBJECT series is a fine approach, and I have no
objections.  But for SoCs where there are several other things that
share power with CPU, we need a more generic, genpd based solution,
which it seems we're in agreement on.  And since the two approaches
are not mutually exclusive, then I have real objections to applying
this series.

I guess a "no" is missing in the last sentence. ;-)

Correct.  I have *no* real objections to applying this series.

Kevin