Re: [PATCH kernel v9 12/32] powerpc/spapr: vfio: Switch from iommu_table to new iommu_table_group
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <hidden>
Date: 2015-04-30 02:30:57
Also in:
lkml
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <hidden>
Date: 2015-04-30 02:30:57
Also in:
lkml
On 04/29/2015 12:49 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:14:36PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:quoted
Modern IBM POWERPC systems support multiple (currently two) TCE tables per IOMMU group (a.k.a. PE). This adds a iommu_table_group container for TCE tables. Right now just one table is supported. For P5IOC2 and IODA, iommu_table_group is embedded into PE struct (pnv_ioda_pe and pnv_phb) and does not require iommu_free_table(), only . iommu_reset_table(). For pSeries, this replaces multiple calls of kzalloc_node() with a new iommu_pseries_group_alloc() helper and stores the table group struct pointer into the pci_dn struct. For release, a iommu_table_group_free() helper is added. This should cause no behavioural change. Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <redacted> [aw: for the vfio related changes] Acked-by: Alex Williamson <redacted>I'm not particularly fond of the "table_group" name, but I can't really think of a better name for now. So,
I asked Ben again. iommu_state is not much better either. I'd stick to iommu_table_group.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <redacted>
-- Alexey