Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2015-03-28

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests/powerpc: Add a test of the switch_endian() syscall

From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-25 11:33:13

On 03/25/2015 10:58 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 16:04 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 11:35 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
quoted
On 03/17/2015 04:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
quoted
What are you seeing exactly?
I am running on a BE PKVM guest but compiling the test case on
a different BE machine which has newer version of the compiler.

cc (GCC) 4.8.3 20140624

cc -O2 -Wall -g -nostdlib -m64   -c -o check.o check.S
objcopy -j .text --reverse-bytes=4 -O binary check.o check-reversed.o
hexdump -v -e '/1 ".byte 0x%02X\n"' check-reversed.o > check-reversed.S
cc -O2 -Wall -g -nostdlib -m64    switch_endian_test.S check-reversed.S   -o switch_endian_test

which looks very similar to the details you have provided above.
Running on guest or host should not make any difference.
No it shouldn't.

Can you try strace, that should give you the full result code.

Also can you try gdb. You can't breakpoint in the wrong-endian region, but it
looks like you're getting through that anyway.

So try setting a breakpoint at line ~77, and you should be back in BE. Then you
can single step and see where it errors out.
Did you try these?
Yeah. The test program is showing some strange behavior.

(1) Without strace: It just fails with 176 return code as before
(2) With strace: It works with return code 0 and prints everything !!

strace ./switch_endian_test
execve("./switch_endian_test", ["./switch_endian_test"], [/* 50 vars */]) = 0
SYS_363(0x5555aaaa5555aaaa, 0x5555aaaa5555aaae, 0x5555aaaa5555aaaf,
0x5555aaaa5555aab0, 0x5555aaaa5555aab1) = 6149008514797120170
write(1, "Hello wrong-endian world\n", 25Hello wrong-endian world
) = 25
SYS_363(0x19, 0x10010638, 0x19, 0x5555aaaa5555aab0, 0x5555aaaa5555aab1) = 25
write(1, "Hello right-endian world\n", 25Hello right-endian world
) = 25
write(1, "success: switch_endian_test\n", 28success: switch_endian_test
) = 28
exit(0)                                 = ?

With GDB and breaking at line 77, it exits with a different exit code this time

30		cmpd    r3,r5
(gdb) 
31		bne     1f
(gdb) 
32		addi    r3,r15,6
(gdb) 
33		cmpd    r3,r6
(gdb) 
34		bne     1f
(gdb) 
98	1:	li	r0, __NR_exit
(gdb) 
99		sc
(gdb) 
[Inferior 1 (process 6456) exited with code 0260]

Also (this might sound bit strange), after multiple attempts of GDB, the program
did ran successfully with exit code of 0. Also it ran successfully without GDB
as well. But again after a fresh reboot, the problem was recreated again.

Will look into this further.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help