Re: Generic IOMMU pooled allocator
From: Sowmini Varadhan <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-22 22:07:23
Also in:
sparclinux
From: Sowmini Varadhan <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-22 22:07:23
Also in:
sparclinux
On (03/23/15 09:02), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
How does this relate to the ARM implementation? There is currently an effort going on to make that one shared with ARM64 and possibly x86. Has anyone looked at both the PowerPC and ARM ways of doing the allocation to see if we could pick one of the two to work on all architectures?What I see in ARM is horribly complex, I can't quite make sense of it in a couple of minutes of looking at it, and doesn't seem to address the basic issue we are addressing here which is the splitting of the iommu table lock.
Amen to that.. I thought it was just me :-) I plan to go through the code to see if/where the armd iommu code does its locking and achieves its parallelism, but the mapping between the sparc/powerpc approach and armd is not immediately obvious to me. --Sowmini