Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/dma: Support 32-bit coherent mask with 64-bit dma_mask
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2015-02-24 20:41:14
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 14:34 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 19:35 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
@@ -149,14 +141,13 @@ static void dma_direct_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, static int dma_direct_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 - /* Could be improved so platforms can set the limit in case - * they have limited DMA windows - */ - return mask >= get_dma_offset(dev) + (memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1); -#else - return 1; + u64 offset = get_dma_offset(dev); + u64 limit = offset + memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1; + +#if defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32) + limit = offset + dma_get_zone_limit(ZONE_DMA32); #endif + return mask >= limit; }I'm confused as to whether dma_supported() is supposed to be testing a coherent mask or regular mask... The above suggests coherent, as does the call to dma_supported() in dma_set_coherent_mask(), but if swiotlb is used, swiotlb_dma_supported() will only check for a mask that can accommodate io_tlb_end, without regard for coherent allocations.
This is confusing indeed, but without the above, dma_set_coherent_mask() won't work ... so I'm assuming the above. Notice that x86 doesn't even bother and basically return 1 for anything above a 24 bit mask (appart from the force_sac case but we can ignore it). So we probably should fix our swiotlb implementation as well... but that's orthogonal.
quoted
static u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c index f146ef0..a7f15e2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c@@ -277,6 +277,11 @@ int dma_pfn_limit_to_zone(u64 pfn_limit) return -EPERM; } +u64 dma_get_zone_limit(int zone) +{ + return max_zone_pfns[zone] << PAGE_SHIFT; +}If you must do this in terms of bytes rather than pfn, cast to u64 before shifting -- and even then the result will be PAGE_SIZE - 1 too small.
Do we have RAM above what a unsigned long can hold ? I think I'll just make it a pfn and respin... Cheers, Ben.
-Scott