Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/mpic: remove unused functions
flat view
From: Arseny Solokha <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-27 02:25:37
Also in:
lkml
quoted hunk
@@ -1676,31 +1666,6 @@ void __init mpic_init(struct mpic *mpic) mpic_err_int_init(mpic, MPIC_FSL_ERR_INT); } -void __init mpic_set_clk_ratio(struct mpic *mpic, u32 clock_ratio) -{ - u32 v; - - v = mpic_read(mpic->gregs, MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1); - v &= ~MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_CLK_RATIO_MASK; - v |= MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_CLK_RATIO(clock_ratio); - mpic_write(mpic->gregs, MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1, v); -} - -void __init mpic_set_serial_int(struct mpic *mpic, int enable) -{ - unsigned long flags; - u32 v; - - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&mpic_lock, flags); - v = mpic_read(mpic->gregs, MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1); - if (enable) - v |= MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_SIE; - else - v &= ~MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1_SIE; - mpic_write(mpic->gregs, MPIC_GREG_GLOBAL_CONF_1, v); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mpic_lock, flags); -} - void mpic_irq_set_priority(unsigned int irq, unsigned int pri) { struct mpic *mpic = mpic_find(irq);
Thinking about it some more, I wonder whether it makes sense to propagate these
values through device tree (and refuse to apply them if they are 0), just like
what timer_group_get_freq() and timer_group_get_irq() in
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic_timer.c do.
Does it have any real use?