Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc: Don't force ENOSYS as error on syscall fail
From: Purcareata Bogdan <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-18 06:51:17
Also in:
lkml
On 18.02.2015 05:01, Mike Strosaker wrote:
This patch failed to build using pseries_le_defconfig. With the change noted below in entry_64.S, the build succeeded and seccomp mode 2 worked correctly. Best, Mike Strosaker On 02/13/2015 02:22 AM, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:quoted
In certain scenarios - e.g. seccomp filtering with ERRNO as default action - the system call fails for other reasons than the syscall not being available. The seccomp filter can be configured to store a user-defined error code on return from a blacklisted syscall. Don't always set ENOSYS on do_syscall_trace_enter failure. Delegate setting ENOSYS in case of failure, where appropriate, to do_syscall_trace_enter. v3: - keep setting ENOSYS in the syscall entry assembly for scenarios without syscall tracing v2: - move setting ENOSYS as errno from the syscall entry assembly to do_syscall_trace_enter, only in the specific case Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S | 7 ++++++- arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 5 +++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S index 46fc0f4..b2f88cd 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S@@ -333,12 +333,12 @@ _GLOBAL(DoSyscall) lwz r11,TI_FLAGS(r10) andi. r11,r11,_TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE bne- syscall_dotrace -syscall_dotrace_cont: cmplwi 0,r0,NR_syscalls lis r10,sys_call_table@h ori r10,r10,sys_call_table@l slwi r0,r0,2 bge- 66f +syscall_dotrace_cont: lwzx r10,r10,r0 /* Fetch system call handler [ptr] */ mtlr r10 addi r9,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD@@ -457,6 +457,11 @@ syscall_dotrace: lwz r7,GPR7(r1) lwz r8,GPR8(r1) REST_NVGPRS(r1) + cmplwi 0,r0,NR_syscalls + lis r10,sys_call_table@h + ori r10,r10,sys_call_table@l + slwi r0,r0,2 + bge- ret_from_syscall b syscall_dotrace_cont syscall_exit_work:diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S index d180caf2..0d22fa8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S@@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ END_FW_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR) ld r10,TI_FLAGS(r11) andi. r11,r10,_TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE bne syscall_dotrace -.Lsyscall_dotrace_cont: cmpldi 0,r0,NR_syscalls bge- syscall_enosys@@ -253,7 +252,9 @@ syscall_dotrace: addi r9,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r10, r1) ld r10,TI_FLAGS(r10) - b .Lsyscall_dotrace_cont + cmpldi 0,r0,NR_syscalls + bge- syscall_exitShouldn't this be .Lsyscall_exit?
Thanks for testing and spotting this! The kernel I tested with didn't have syscall_exit converted to a local label (commit 4c3b21686111e0ac6018469dacbc5549f9915cf8). Will resend with this change. Bogdan P.
quoted
+ b system_call syscall_enosys: li r3,-ENOSYSdiff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index f21897b..2edae06 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c@@ -1775,13 +1775,15 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) secure_computing_strict(regs->gpr[0]); if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) && - tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) + tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) { /* * Tracing decided this syscall should not happen. * We'll return a bogus call number to get an ENOSYS * error, but leave the original number in regs->gpr[0]. */ ret = -1L; + syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, ENOSYS, 0); + } if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))) trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->gpr[0]);