Re: [PATCH] powerpc: re-enable dynticks
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2015-02-16 04:07:06
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 11:08 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 13:38 -0600, Paul Clarke wrote:quoted
implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting architectures to implement a suitable arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() routine. Several arches have implemented this routine, including x86 (3010279f) and arm (09f6edd4), but powerpc was omitted. This patch implements this routine for powerpc.
.../...
It makes the message change, but is that correct? ie. do we actually implement "IRQ work self-IPIs"?
I think so... Fred, do you think what we do will work ? We hijack our decrementer (local timer) by making it shoot almost immediately (1 tick away) and run the irq work at the beginning of __timer_interrupt(). At that point we are on our irq stack and have done irq_enter but that's about it. Cheers, Ben.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.hb/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..18365ec--- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H +#define _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H + +#include <asm/processor.h> + +static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void) +{ + return 1;Should be "true";quoted
+}cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev