Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 5 authors, 2015-02-27

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: re-enable dynticks

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2015-02-16 04:07:06
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 11:08 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 13:38 -0600, Paul Clarke wrote:
quoted
implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc

Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for 
full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting architectures to 
implement a suitable arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() routine.

Several arches have implemented this routine, including x86 (3010279f) 
and arm (09f6edd4), but powerpc was omitted.

This patch implements this routine for powerpc.
 .../...
It makes the message change, but is that correct? ie. do we actually implement
"IRQ work self-IPIs"?
I think so... Fred, do you think what we do will work ? We hijack our
decrementer (local timer) by making it shoot almost immediately (1 tick
away) and run the irq work at the beginning of __timer_interrupt().

At that point we are on our irq stack and have done irq_enter but that's
about it.

Cheers,
Ben.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18365ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
+#define _ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
+
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+
+static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
+{
+	return 1;
Should be "true";
quoted
+}
cheers


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help