Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] powerpc/mpc85xx: Add FSL QorIQ DPAA BMan support to device tree(s)
From: Emil Medve <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-03 20:19:23
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Hello Arnd, Thanks for taking the time to review this On 12/03/2014 01:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 01:53:39 Emil Medve wrote:quoted
On 12/02/2014 06:32 PM, Scott Wood wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 04:02 -0600, Emil Medve wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240rdb.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240rdb.dts index 53761d4..431bf4e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240rdb.dts +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240rdb.dts@@ -69,10 +69,27 @@ device_type = "memory"; }; + reserved-memory { + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + bman_fbpr: bman-fbpr { + compatible = "fsl,bman-fbpr"; + alloc-ranges = <0 0 0xffff 0xffffffff>; + size = <0 0x1000000>; + alignment = <0 0x1000000>; + }; + };Can't this be done at the SoC level rather than board level?The size of the memory is not SoC specific. Among other things is determined by the number of MACs that are pinned-out on the boardIs this really a hardware property then, or some setting?
I'm unsure how to answer this. It is my opinion it's a hardware property and that we're not stretching the intent of the reserved-memory binding
Also, if you use the name 'ranges', I would assume that the second set of two cells is a length and should be <0 0 0x10000 0>.
Uh... Right. I'll fix it
Finally, you add a label here, so anything that is not board specific could just stay in the per-soc file, with the board specific properties added at teh board level.
I will do that Cheers,