On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Anton Blanchard [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Ingo,
quoted
At that point I thought the previous task_cpu() was somewhat ingrained
in the scheduler and came up with the patch. If not, we could go on a
hunt to see what else needs fixing.
I had another look. The scheduled does indeed make assumptions about the
previous task_cpu, but we have a hammer to fix it up called
select_fallback_rq.
I annotated select_fallback_rq, and did hit a case where the CPU was
not active. ppc64 patch below.
Anton, I'll assume I will get this through the usual powerpc pull requests?
quoted
I think x86 have a similar (although harder to hit) issue.
Indeed way harder to hit:
CPU 0 CPU 1
set_cpu_online(1, true) {
while (!cpu_online(cpu1)) cpumask_set_cpu(1, to_cpumask(cpu_online_bits));
relax();
wakeup_thread_on_cpu1();
cpumask_set_cpu(1, to_cpumask(cpu_active_bits));
On bare metal probably impossible, but on virt it should be
observable. Fix is simple.
Thanks,
tglx
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 668d8f2a8781..534f3384f03f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -222,7 +222,6 @@ static void notrace start_secondary(void *unused)
lock_vector_lock();
set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), true);
unlock_vector_lock();
- per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE;
x86_platform.nmi_init();
/* enable local interrupts */
@@ -234,6 +233,7 @@ static void notrace start_secondary(void *unused)
x86_cpuinit.setup_percpu_clockev();
wmb();
+ per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE;
cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_ONLINE);
}
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ int native_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
check_tsc_sync_source(cpu);
local_irq_restore(flags);
- while (!cpu_online(cpu)) {
+ while (per_cpu(cpu_state,cpu) != CPU_ONLINE) {
cpu_relax();
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}