Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsl_ifc: Support all 8 IFC chip selects
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-22 17:51:58
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 20:07 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
Sorry Scott for late reply, Please find my reply in-lined On 8/21/2014 4:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 09:05 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:quoted
On 8/20/2014 5:38 AM, Scott Wood wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 16:07 -0500, Aaron Sierra wrote:quoted
Freescale's QorIQ T Series processors support 8 IFC chip selects within a memory map backward compatible with previous P Series processors which supported only 4 chip selects. Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <redacted> --- include/linux/fsl_ifc.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h b/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h index 84d60cb..62762ff 100644 --- a/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h +++ b/include/linux/fsl_ifc.h@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/of_platform.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> -#define FSL_IFC_BANK_COUNT 4 +#define FSL_IFC_BANK_COUNT 8First please modify fsl_ifc_nand.c to limit itself to the number of banks it dynamically determines are present based on the IFC version.Number of available bank/chip select are defined by SoC and it is independent of SoC.Do you mean defined by the SoC and independent of the IFC version?IFC v 1.0.0 supports 4 Chip Select. IFC v 1.1.0 onwards, IFC supports 8 chip select. But SoC finally defines number of chip select coming out of SoC. Like LS1021A with IFC ver 1.4.0 have only 7 Chip Select.
What matters here is whether the registers are implemented, not whether a chip select is pinned out -- so use the IFC version. -Scott