Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dts: fsl-usb: Document USB node compatible string for IP version
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-27 23:34:55
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 00:46 -0500, Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Wood Scott-B07421 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:23 AM To: Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 Cc: Badola Nikhil-B46172; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dts: fsl-usb: Document USB node compatible string for IP version On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 00:05 -0500, Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 wrote:quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Badola Nikhil-B46172 Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 10:18 AM To: Wood Scott-B07421 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Documentation: dts: fsl-usb: Document USB node compatible string for IP version Adding Ramneekquoted
-----Original Message----- From: Wood Scott-B07421 Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 3:53 AM To: Badola Nikhil-B46172 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dts: fsl-usb: Document USB node compatible string for IP version On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 14:48 +0530, Nikhil Badola wrote:quoted
Document compatible string containing IP version in USB device tree node Signed-off-by: Nikhil Badola <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl-usb.txt | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Please CC devicetree@vger.kernel.org on all device tree patches (in addition to linuxppc-dev).quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl-usb.txtb/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl-usb.txt index 4779c02..5a3a0a8 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl-usb.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl-usb.txt@@ -10,7 +10,10 @@ Required properties : controllers, or "fsl-usb2-dr" for dual role USB controllers or "fsl,mpc5121-usb2-dr" for dual role USB controllers of MPC5121. Wherever applicable, the IP version of the USB controller should - also be mentioned (for eg. fsl-usb2-dr-v2.2 for bsc9132). + also be mentioned in another string. + For multi port host USB controller with IP version <IP_Ver>, it shouldbequoted
quoted
quoted
+ "fsl-usb2-mph-<IP_Ver>". For dual role USB controller with IP version + <IP_Ver>, it should be "fsl-usb2-dr-<IP_Ver>".It was documented before -- this is just making it more explicit, right? FWIW, the version number can be read out of a USB register, so I'd rather remove the suggestion to specify the version number and replace it with a reference to the ID register.we have following two issues - (a) our USBIP version register doesn't have consistent "version field size" over multiple version(s). This is why we couldn't use it for reading version info across various IP versions (b) this register is not exposed in all SoC RMs (probably because of above reason):-( If this is just a problem with older chips, we could have a new compatible name that designates the family of USB block versions with a sane version register.we could have done...but we have a requirement to write version specific code... for instance, usb controller init sequence has changes from version 2.5 onwards... then there are version specific errata fixe(s) also. Hence we decided to go for compatible string containing hw ip version (major no.) so that our workaround/code is consistent with hw ip version(s) published in errata(s)
I wasn't saying ignore version differences. I was suggesting that we make a special case out of older versions where the version register is different/broken. -Scott