Re: [PATCH] powerpc: non-GPL export for eeh_dev_check_failure
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2014-08-11 03:17:09
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 15:51 +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 20:12:09 +0530 Vishal Mansur [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
EEH kernel services are inconsistently exported by the kernel. eeh_check_failure is exported for any use, but eeh_dev_check_failure is exported only for GPL use. While eeh_check_failure is implemented for a specific purpose to be used by services such as readl, it is not suited for a purpose where caller needs eeh status. This functionality is provided by eeh_dev_check_failure. This patch relaxes the export for eeh_dev_check_failure to make it consistent with eeh_check_failure() and usable by non-GPL modules.The GPL covers all derivative works. Tweaking this doesn't magically allow you to use the feature in non GPL code. Your legal department can I am sure explain in detail further.
This is an interesting case... I assume this has to do with a well known GPU manufacturer... The PCI APIs are generally exported in such a way that a non-GPL driver can use them (regardless of whether one considers a non-GPL driver to be legal here or not, this is besides the point). eeh_dev_check_failure() can be considered as powerpc specific extension of the PCI API for use by PCI drivers and as such, it *could* be construed that we should be consistent (and consistent with eeh_check_failure()) and expose it as an EXPORT_SYMBOL without the GPL suffix. So I'm somewhat tempted to take this patch, but Vishal, the driver in question could, I suppose, as a workaround, use a readl to some scratch register of some description, no ? Cheers, Ben.
Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/