powerpc: Fix bugs in emulate_step()

Started by Paul Mackerras on Jul 19, 2014

Subsystems (2)

Maintainers (2)

DORMANTno replies

open the first message on its own page

Message details and related content
This fixes some bugs in emulate_step().  First, the setting of the carry
bit for the arithmetic right-shift instructions was not correct on 64-bit
machines because we were masking with a mask of type int rather than
unsigned long.  Secondly, the sld (shift left doubleword) instruction was
using the wrong instruction field for the register containing the shift
count.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
index 412dd46..5c09f36 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 			sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x3f;
 			ival = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];
 			regs->gpr[ra] = ival >> (sh < 32 ? sh : 31);
-			if (ival < 0 && (sh >= 32 || (ival & ((1 << sh) - 1)) != 0))
+			if (ival < 0 && (sh >= 32 || (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0))
 				regs->xer |= XER_CA;
 			else
 				regs->xer &= ~XER_CA;
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 			sh = rb;
 			ival = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];
 			regs->gpr[ra] = ival >> sh;
-			if (ival < 0 && (ival & ((1 << sh) - 1)) != 0)
+			if (ival < 0 && (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0)
 				regs->xer |= XER_CA;
 			else
 				regs->xer &= ~XER_CA;
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 		case 27:	/* sld */
-			sh = regs->gpr[rd] & 0x7f;
+			sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x7f;
 			if (sh < 64)
 				regs->gpr[ra] = regs->gpr[rd] << sh;
 			else
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 			sh = regs->gpr[rb] & 0x7f;
 			ival = (signed long int) regs->gpr[rd];
 			regs->gpr[ra] = ival >> (sh < 64 ? sh : 63);
-			if (ival < 0 && (sh >= 64 || (ival & ((1 << sh) - 1)) != 0))
+			if (ival < 0 && (sh >= 64 || (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0))
 				regs->xer |= XER_CA;
 			else
 				regs->xer &= ~XER_CA;
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 			sh = rb | ((instr & 2) << 4);
 			ival = (signed long int) regs->gpr[rd];
 			regs->gpr[ra] = ival >> sh;
-			if (ival < 0 && (ival & ((1 << sh) - 1)) != 0)
+			if (ival < 0 && (ival & ((1ul << sh) - 1)) != 0)
 				regs->xer |= XER_CA;
 			else
 				regs->xer &= ~XER_CA;
-- 
2.0.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help