Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 5 authors, 2014-07-18

Re: [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: Remove default gate area

From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Date: 2014-07-18 10:20:31
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-um

Am 18.07.2014 12:14, schrieb Will Deacon:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:47:26PM +0100, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The core mm code will provide a default gate area based on
FIXADDR_USER_START and FIXADDR_USER_END if
!defined(__HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA) && defined(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR).

This default is only useful for ia64.  arm64, ppc, s390, sh, tile,
64-bit UML, and x86_32 have their own code just to disable it.  arm,
32-bit UML, and x86_64 have gate areas, but they have their own
implementations.

This gets rid of the default and moves the code into ia64.

This should save some code on architectures without a gate area: it's
now possible to inline the gate_area functions in the default case.
Can one of you pull this somewhere?  Otherwise I can put it somewhere
stable and ask for -next inclusion, but that seems like overkill for a
single patch.
For the um bits:
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
I'd be happy to take the arm64 part, but it doesn't feel right for mm/*
changes (or changes to other archs) to go via our tree.

I'm not sure what the best approach is if you want to send this via a single
tree. Maybe you could ask akpm nicely?
Going though Andrew's tree sounds sane to me.

Thanks,
//richard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help