On 06/26/2014 07:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:

On 06.06.14 02:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:

quoted

On 06/05/2014 09:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:

quoted

On 05.06.14 09:25, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:

quoted

This reserves 2 capability numbers.

This implements an extended version of KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_64 ioctl.

Please advise how to proceed with these patches as I suspect that
first two should go via Paolo's tree while the last one via Alex Graf's
tree
(correct?).

They would just go via my tree, but only be actually allocated (read:
mergable to qemu) when they hit Paolo's tree.

In fact, I don't think it makes sense to split them off at all.

So? Are these patches going anywhere? Thanks.

So? Are you going to address the comments?

Sorry, I cannot find here anything to fix. Ben asked some questions, I
answered and there were no objections. What do I miss this time?...


-- 
Alexey