Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] DMA: Freescale: add fsl_dma_free_descriptor() to reduce code duplication
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2014-04-10 11:29:27
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 15:10 +0800, hongbo.zhang@freescale.com wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Hongbo Zhang <redacted> There are several places where descriptors are freed using identical code. This patch puts this code into a function to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang <redacted> Signed-off-by: Qiang Liu <redacted> --- drivers/dma/fsldma.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c index b71cc04..b5a0ffa 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c@@ -418,6 +418,19 @@ static dma_cookie_t fsl_dma_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx) } /** + * fsl_dma_free_descriptor - Free descriptor from channel's DMA pool. + * @chan : Freescale DMA channel + * @desc: descriptor to be freed + */ +static void fsl_dma_free_descriptor(struct fsldma_chan *chan, + struct fsl_desc_sw *desc) +{ + list_del(&desc->node); + chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc); + dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, desc->async_tx.phys); +} + +/** * fsl_dma_alloc_descriptor - Allocate descriptor from channel's DMA pool. * @chan : Freescale DMA channel *@@ -489,11 +502,8 @@ static void fsldma_free_desc_list(struct fsldma_chan *chan, { struct fsl_desc_sw *desc, *_desc; - list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, list, node) { - list_del(&desc->node); - chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc); - dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, desc->async_tx.phys); - } + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, list, node) + fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc); } static void fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(struct fsldma_chan *chan,@@ -501,11 +511,8 @@ static void fsldma_free_desc_list_reverse(struct fsldma_chan *chan, { struct fsl_desc_sw *desc, *_desc; - list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(desc, _desc, list, node) { - list_del(&desc->node); - chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc); - dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, desc->async_tx.phys); - } + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(desc, _desc, list, node) + fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc); } /**@@ -819,8 +826,7 @@ static void fsldma_cleanup_descriptor(struct fsldma_chan *chan, dma_run_dependencies(txd); dma_descriptor_unmap(txd); - chan_dbg(chan, "LD %p free\n", desc); - dma_pool_free(chan->desc_pool, desc, txd->phys); + fsl_dma_free_descriptor(chan, desc);
Here is no list_del() call since it's been called in dma_do_tasklet(). What will be the result of double list_del() against the same node?
} /**
-- Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] Intel Finland Oy