Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] powernv: cpufreq driver for powernv platform

On 21 March 2014 20:18, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
[off-list ref] wrote:

Yeah, I had the driver written using driver_data to store pstates.
Gautham found the bug that we are missing one PState when we match the
ID with CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ!

I see..

We did not know that you have taken care of those issues.  Ideally
I did expect that driver_data should not be touched by the framework.
Thanks for fixing that and allowing the back-end driver to use
driver_data.

No, I haven't fixed anything yet. And this piece of code still exists.
I will see if I can get this fixed, by that time you can continue the
way your code is there in this version.