Re: [PATCH 0/4] powernv: kvm: numa fault improvement

On 11.12.2013, at 09:47, Liu Ping Fan [off-list ref] wrote:

This series is based on Aneesh's series  "[PATCH -V2 0/5] powerpc: mm: =

Numa faults support for ppc64"

=20
For this series, I apply the same idea from the previous thread =

"[PATCH 0/3] optimize for powerpc _PAGE_NUMA"

(for which, I still try to get a machine to show nums)
=20
But for this series, I think that I have a good justification -- the =

fact of heavy cost when switching context between guest and host,

which is  well known.

This cover letter isn't really telling me anything. Please put a proper =
description of what you're trying to achieve, why you're trying to =
achieve what you're trying and convince your readers that it's a good =
idea to do it the way you do it.

If my suppose is correct, will CCing kvm@vger.kernel.org from next =

version.

This translates to me as "This is an RFC"?


Alex