Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 6 authors, 2014-02-07

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] X86: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call()

From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-29 19:02:32
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-sh, lkml

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The core idle loop now takes care of it.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <redacted>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <redacted>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 3fb8d95ab8..4505e2a950 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -298,10 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
  */
 void arch_cpu_idle(void)
 {
-       if (cpuidle_idle_call())
-               x86_idle();
-       else
-               local_irq_enable();
+       x86_idle();
You're taking out the local_irq_enable() here but I don't see the
equivalent of adding it back in the 1/6 patch that moves the
cpuidle_idle_call() up to common code. It seems that one of the call
paths through cpuidle_idle_call() don't re-enable it on its own.

Even if this is the right thing to do, why it's OK to do so should
probably be documented in the patch description.


-Olof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help