Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] drivers: base: support cpu cache information interface to userspace via sysfs
From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-09 19:19:03
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 08/01/14 20:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 07:26:06PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:quoted
From: Sudeep Holla <redacted> This patch adds initial support for providing processor cache informatio=
n
quoted
to userspace through sysfs interface. This is based on x86 implementatio=
n
quoted
and hence the interface is intended to be fully compatible. A per-cpu array of cache information maintained is used mainly for sysfs-related book keeping. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted> --- drivers/base/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
+++++++
quoted
include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 43 +++++++ 3 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c create mode 100644 include/linux/cacheinfo.hdiff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile index 94e8a80..76f07c8 100644 --- a/drivers/base/Makefile +++ b/drivers/base/Makefile@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ obj-y=09=09=09:=3D core.o bus.o dd.o syscore.o \ =09=09=09 driver.o class.o platform.o \ =09=09=09 cpu.o firmware.o init.o map.o devres.o \ =09=09=09 attribute_container.o transport_class.o \ -=09=09=09 topology.o +=09=09=09 topology.o cacheinfo.o obj-$(CONFIG_DEVTMPFS)=09+=3D devtmpfs.o obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_CMA) +=3D dma-contiguous.o obj-y=09=09=09+=3D power/diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f436c31 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ +/* + * cacheinfo support - processor cache information via sysfs + * + * Copyright (C) 2013 ARM Ltd. + * All Rights Reserved + * + * Author: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + */ +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/cacheinfo.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> +#include <linux/cpu.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/kobject.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/sysfs.h> + +struct cache_attr { +=09struct attribute attr; +=09 ssize_t(*show) (unsigned int, unsigned short, char *); +=09 ssize_t(*store) (unsigned int, unsigned short, const char *, size_t=
);
quoted
+}; + +/* pointer to kobject for cpuX/cache */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kobject *, ci_cache_kobject); +#define per_cpu_cache_kobject(cpu) (per_cpu(ci_cache_kobject, cpu)) + +struct index_kobject { +=09struct kobject kobj; +=09unsigned int cpu; +=09unsigned short index; +}; + +static cpumask_t cache_dev_map; + +/* pointer to array of kobjects for cpuX/cache/indexY */=20 Please don't use "raw" kobjects for this, use the device attribute groups, that's what they are there for. Bonus is that your code should get a lot simpler when you do that. =20
Yes I now understand device attribute group simplifies the code, but I thin= k kobjects are still needed as we need to track both cpu and cache index. By reusing only cpu device kobject, we can track cpu only. Please correct me if I am missing to understand something here. One thought I have is to make cache_info structure common to all architectu= re (for now its ARM specific) and introduce kobject in that similar to ia64 implementation. That even eliminates lot of weak functions defined. Regards, Sudeep