Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] powerpc kvm: fix deadlock scene
From: Liu ping fan <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-11 01:02:11
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:29:52PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:quoted
v2->v3: introduce kvmppc_hv_unlock_hpte() to pair with kvmppc_hv_find_lock_hpte() and hide the preemption detail inside this pair from the callersActually, I preferred v2. This version seems a bit over-engineered. Making a kvmppc_hv_unlock_hpte() is not such a bad idea, though I would make it identical to the existing unlock_hpte() from
Do you think it is helpful to distingusish HPTE_V_LOCK from HPTE_V_HVLOCK at an API level? If it is, I will keep patch 1/2 and just fix patch 2/2 .
book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c, just in a header. I'm really not convinced about putting the preempt_disable/enable inside the lock/unlock functions, with the consequent need to pass in a 'vmode' parameter, given that there is just one caller that needs to do the preempt_disable/enable.
Ok, will fix patch 2/2 Thanks and regards, Pingfan