Re: [PATCH RFC v5 2/5] dma: mpc512x: add support for peripheral transfers

2013/11/15 Gerhard Sittig [off-list ref]:

As for the not yet addressed feedback:  From the top of my head I
can think of the execute comment which contradicts the code
(which suggests that at least one of them is wrong), and the data
type mismatch in the config routine (where code just happens to
work by coincidence).  And in bypassing I noticed that your
recent submission has coding style issues (braces, indentation),
which should no longer happen after several iterations as you
should know how to prepare and check the next version.

I'll doublecheck this and return with improved code.

Without feedback, reviewers
may see several submissions which suffer from the same issues,
and expect more to show up and thus feel that their feedback is
getting ignored.  Which quickly becomes tiring.

Thanks for your patience and comprehensive replies.

Best regards,
Alexander.