Re: [PATCH RFC v5 2/5] dma: mpc512x: add support for peripheral transfers

Hello, Gerhard!

2013/11/12 Gerhard Sittig [off-list ref]:

Alexander, there is outstanding review feedback for a previous
version of the series that you haven't addressed yet.  Can you
please either look into those issues, or state that it's OK to
leave them and why this is so?

Excuse me for misunderstanding, Gerhard.
I have thoroughly worked on your feedback to RFCv4
and agreed to your points. So I've just wrote RFCv5.
And all the improvements and known issues based on your feedback
are listed in the cover letter [PATCH RFC v5 0/5].

It would be nice to get a
response to the feedback that you are given.  It may be
appropriate not to obey to the feedback, but at least it should
get considered.

Yes, I see. My implicit response by RFCv5 was not efficient, sorry.
Now should I write a detailed answer in the thread with your feedback
for improving readability of the discussion?

Have you noticed the recent introduction of the dmaengine@vger
ML?

No, I didn't.

Make sure to include it upon the next submission.

Ok, I will.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Alexander.