Re: [PATCH 0/2] move of_find_next_cache_node to DT core

On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:42:49 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Grant,

On 18/09/13 17:18, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:

quoted

On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <redacted>

Hi,

The cache bindings are generic and used by many other architectures
apart from PPC. These patches fixes and move the existing definition
of of_find_next_cache_node to DT common code.

Regards,
Sudeep

Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted>

However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures
yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series..

Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo
for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea
to combine it as its still initial RFC version.

Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache topology
support patches[1] on ARM ?

Ben's already picked it up, so I'm fine with it.

g.