Re: [tpmdd-devel] Has anyone a ATMEL TPM Chip on PPC64 (CONFIG_TCG_ATMEL)?
From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-29 00:11:43
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:03:43PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
On 10/27/2013 05:06 PM, Peter H?we wrote:quoted
Hi, I was wondering if anyone here on this list still has a machine with an old ATMEL TPM (trusted platform module) lying around?quoted
From the kconfig entry it becomes evident that it was only supported on ppc64machines. config TCG_ATMEL tristate "Atmel TPM Interface" depends on PPC64 || HAS_IOPORT
Hurm, that is crazy, because tpm_atmel.h contains an #else block for !CONFIG_PPC64. The single major source of complexity in this driver is that else block. The driver would be fine, and straightforward if it was a standard, modern DT enabled driver, which is very easy if PPC64 is the only supported implementation.
I reccomend removing the driver. If the stars align and a user actually appears who wants to use one I'll clean up the driver and resubmit it for inclusion. I just don't think that will happen.
The needed clean up is really easy actually, replace everything below
'tpm_vendor_specific tpm_atmel' with approximately this:
static int atml_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tpm_chip *chip;
struct resrouce *res;
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
if (!r)
return -EIO;
if (!(chip = tpm_register_hardware(dev, &tpm_atmel)))
return -ENODEV;
chip->iobase = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
if (!chip->iobase)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
static void atml_plat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
tpm_remove_hardware(chip->dev);
};
static const struct of_device_id platform_match[] = {
{.compatible = "AT97SC3201"},
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, platform_match);
static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_atml_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_pm_resume);
static struct platform_driver atml_drv = {
.probe = atml_probe,
.remove = atml_plat_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "tpm_atmel",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pm = &tpm_atml_pm,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(platform_match),
},
};
module_platform_driver(atml_drv);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Leendert van Doorn (leendert@watson.ibm.com)");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPM Driver");
MODULE_VERSION("2.0");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
If you guys can convice yourselves that doesn't obviously break anything I can
probably send a proper patch.
Jason