On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I don't know enough about VFIO to understand why these new interfaces are
needed.  Is this the first VFIO IOMMU driver?  I see vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c and
vfio_iommu_type1.c but I don't know if they're comparable to the Freescale PAMU.
Do other VFIO IOMMU implementations support MSI?  If so, do they handle the
problem of mapping the MSI regions in a different way?

PAMU is an aperture type of IOMMU while other are paging type, So they are completely different from what PAMU is and handle that differently.

This is not an explanation or a justification for adding new
interfaces.  I still have no idea what an "aperture type IOMMU" is,
other than that it is "different."  But I see that Alex is working on
this issue with you in a different thread, so I'm sure you guys will
sort it out.

Bjorn