Re: [PATCH v2] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let check zero instead of check NO_IRQ

[PATCH] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let checking none-zero instead of checking NO_IRQ · Chen Gang <hidden> · 2013-09-23
Re: [PATCH] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let checking none-zero instead of checking NO_IRQ · Chen Gang <hidden> · 2013-09-23
[PATCH v2] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let check zero instead of check NO_IRQ · Chen Gang <hidden> · 2013-09-23
Re: [PATCH v2] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let check zero instead of check NO_IRQ · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2013-09-26
Re: [PATCH v2] sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: let check zero instead of check NO_IRQ · Chen Gang <hidden> · 2013-09-26

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2013-09-26 10:29:23
Also in: alsa-devel

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:36:21AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:

NO_IRQ may be defined as '(unsigned int) -1' in some architectures
(arm, sh ...), and either may not be defined in some architectures
which can enable SND_SOC_FSL_SSI (e.g. allmodconfig for arc).

Applied, thanks.

Attachments

signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 836 bytes

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help